Image 01

TobaccoReviews

Tobacco reviews and buying cheap cigarettes

Posts Tagged ‘marlboro cigarettes’

Ice Cream and Marlboro Cheaper in East Jerusalem

Monday, July 4th, 2018

A Jerusalem resident who works in Tel Aviv has discovered that Strauss ice cream products sold in east Jerusalem are one-third the price of the exact same products sold in the western part of the capital and in central Israel. Shlomi lives in the French Hill neighborhood, but buys ice cream for his daughter in the nearby Arab neighborhoods of Beit Hanina, Shuafat and Sheikh Jarrah.

“The price of ice cream bars has become very expensive recently,” he tells Ynet, “and the same products are sold there for ridiculous prices.

“A Popsicle sold here for NIS 2.5 (72 cents) and in Tel Aviv for NIS 3.5 ($1) is sold there for only NIS 1 (29 cents). A simple Cornetto sold in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv for NIS 7.5 ($2.16) is sold there for NIS 2.5. Why?”

Shlomi visited Strauss’ website and asked the same question. “They wrote me back, claiming that they have no control over their prices. There’s a recommended consumer pricelist, but they can’t limit the prices.

“I think it’s impossible. There are differences between cities and neighborhoods because of rent prices and types of population, but here we see price differences of 150% or more.”

‘Other products not much cheaper’

According to Shlomi, the price differences are not the result of the cheaper rent and much lower income of the local population, in light of the prices of other products in the Arab neighborhoods’ stores.

“It’s just the ice cream. The rest of the products are not much cheaper than in stores in the Jewish sector,” he says.

“Cottage cheese costs NIS 7 ($2) there, 1 liter of Heinz ketchup costs NIS 17 ($4.90), six bottles of Neviot water cost NIS 14 ($4), and pasta costs NIS 7-8 ($2-2.30). Marlboro cigarettes cost NIS 22 ($6.35) there while we pay NIS 24 ($6.95), but that’s a small difference compared to the strange differences in ice cream prices.

“If Strauss Ice Cream are not giving them a special price, how is it possible that all other products are sold for prices similar to the Jewish sector? It’s impossible that the store is willing to sustain such big losses on ice cream. Could it be that the company has decided to absorb the losses to gain a large amount of sales?

“I believe it’s in Strauss’ interest to sell to one population at rock bottom prices and to another at high prices. It’s a trend. I saw the ice cream cases arriving at one of the stores there, and it says ‘sector’ on it, because it’s a special production with Arab captions, and I believe the price is special too.

“The taste is the same taste and the product’s size is the same size. I have to buy there because I can’t afford ice cream for my daughter at the current prices.”

Strauss Ice Cream said in response, “The consumer price is not determined by us, but by the retailers themselves. Strauss Ice Cream has a uniform pricelist for all products. It should be noted that the variety of products offered by the company includes products designated for different sectors.”

Marlboro Cigs were not Defectively Designed

Friday, May 27th, 2018

buy marlboro gold cigarettesPhilip Morris USA (PM USA) said today a jury in Worcester, MA returned a verdict for the defense, holding that Marlboro cigarettes were not defectively designed and unreasonably dangerous. “We believe that the jury appropriately found that Marlboro cigarettes were not defectively designed and unreasonably dangerous”

“We believe that the jury appropriately found that Marlboro cigarettes were not defectively designed and unreasonably dangerous,” said Murray Garnick, Altria Client Services senior vice president and associate general counsel, speaking on behalf of PM USA. “The jury correctly rejected the plaintiffs’ theory that the company should have sold only virtually nicotine-free cigarettes.”

Filed in 2001, the plaintiffs’ sole claim in this case was that PM USA breached an implied warranty of merchantability in failing to market only virtually nicotine-free cigarettes. The plaintiffs had stipulated that the decedent was fully aware of the risks of cigarette addiction and lung cancer from smoking cigarettes and that the proposed virtually nicotine-free cigarette would be unacceptable to a vast majority of smokers.

Today’s verdict marks the second defense verdict for PM USA this month, following a May 16th jury’s decision in favor of the company in a federal court in New York (Grill). These two cases are the first new individual smoking and health cases tried by the company in five years, with the exception of the Engle cases in Florida

Adults Undervalue Tobacco Advertising in Stores

Monday, April 4th, 2018

An informal survey conducted in the Ontario, Seneca, Wayne and Yates county area finds that adults significantly underestimate the extent of tobacco product advertising in stores that sell Marlboro cigarettes. As part of the annual Kick Butts Day, the survey was conducted by the Tobacco Action Coalition of the Finger Lakes to see if local consumers are aware of the targeted marketing and its impressions on youth.

The survey found:

Some 90 percent of people surveyed said that when they visit a convenience store, supermarket or gas station, they observe 10 or fewer cigarette ads. In fact, a statewide study conducted for the New York State Department of Health in 2007 found an average of 18 ads per store.

Some 30 percent of people surveyed believed tobacco advertising influences children ‘a lot.”
Research has found that weekly or more frequent exposure to retail tobacco marketing is associated with a 50 percent increase in the odds that adolescents will ever smoke. Stores are one of the last venues where tobacco advertising reaches youth. Ads on TV, radio and billboards are banned, as well as cartoon characters, sponsorships and giveaways. Magazine advertising is restricted to predominantly adult-oriented publications. However, in-store advertising, promotions and product displays remain unrestricted.

Some 98 percent of adults questioned said they see tobacco advertising in stores and 72 percent notice products displayed behind the counter “most of the time” or “always.” So while adults notice the ads, they underestimate the amount of tobacco advertising, and its impact on children.

Tobacco companies spend billions each year to market their deadly products in convenience stores, grocery stores and pharmacies. Of the $12.5 billion spent by cigarette companies on overall promotions in 2006, 90 percent was spent on point of sale advertisements, price discounts, promotional allowances, or special deals such as buy-one-get-one-free offers. National marketing data shows that 75 percent of teenagers shop in a convenience store at least once a week.

“These findings indicate that adults are concerned about the impact of tobacco advertising but underestimate how much of it kids are exposed to every time they walk into a convenience store,” said Penny Gugino, Director of TACFL. “As we educate them more about the extent of tobacco advertising and tobacco product displays, which are just a different form of commercial messaging, I think they will demand that stores change their policies.”

The survey was conducted by TACFL between Feb. 28 and March 7. Respondents were reached by telephone and in person. While not a statistically valid sample, the findings are believed to generally reflect knowledge and attitudes in the community as a whole. Full results of the five question survey are attached.

Sponsored by the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, Kick Butts Day is an annual celebration of youth leadership and activism in the fight against tobacco use. Kids are sending two powerful messages on Kick Butts Day: They want the tobacco companies to stop targeting them with marketing for cigarettes and other tobacco products, and they want elected leaders to do more to protect them from tobacco.

Tobacco use is the number one cause of preventable death in the United States, killing more than 400,000 people and costing $96 billion in health care bills each year. While the nation has made significant progress in reducing youth smoking, 20 percent of high school students still smoke.

In New York, tobacco use claims 25,400 lives and costs $8.17 billion in health care bills each year. Currently, 14.8 percent of the state’s high school students smoke, and 24,100 kids become new daily smokers each year.

“We protect our children from many dangers, tobacco should definitely be one of them,” Gugino added.

Google Is World’s Most Valuable Brand But Marlboro is Near the Top

Tuesday, March 22nd, 2018

Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) is the world’s most valuable brand with a $43.3 billion valuation. It is followed by Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT), Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT), IBM (NYSE: IBM), Vodafone (NYSE: VOD), Bank of America (NYSE: BAC), GE (NYSE: GE), Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL), Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC), and GE (NYSE: GE).

Many brand experts will have a problem with the Apple number. Why should discredited banks do so well? The data come from Brandirectory and its “World’s Most Valuable Brands List” which measures 500 brands. The methodology is based on discounted cash flow, future royalties, and the present value of intellectual property. It is, in other words, a black box that no one outside Brandirectory can fully understand.

There is a large industry in brand valuation research. It is led by BrandZ and Interbrand. Each of these companies has its own methodology so there is no consistent way to measure brand values. The wide differences among the results underscores this inconsistency.

The values get more obscure based on the numbers further down the list. Marlboro is No. 499 on the Brandirectory tables. It has a value of $2.3 billion. On the BrandZ and Interbrand lists, Marlboro is near the top and is worth tens of billions of dollars. How can the world’s most widely smoked cigarette do so poorly on one list and not the others?

The brand valuation industry has a bad name. It is no wonder when the figures from one research firm vary so wildly from the next. Each claims it has the best figures, but none are willing to explain why in a convincing way.