Image 01

TobaccoReviews

Tobacco reviews and buying cheap cigarettes

Posts Tagged ‘indoor smoking’

Bulgaria Smoke-Free Nations

Friday, May 18th, 2019

Bulgaria’s parliament voted on Thursday to prohibit smoking cigarettes in all indoor places starting with June 1 in an attempt to convince one of Europe’s heaviest smoking nations to quit smoking. The European Union’s poorest member state has joined a growing list of nations to not permitted smoking in bars and restaurants. It also agreed to ban smoking outside nurseries and schools and at stadiums during sports and cultural events.

The move was appreciated by health experts and also nonsmokers. More than 40 per cent of the adult inhabitants smokes in the Balkan country.

Inspectors will enforce fines of up to 5,000 levs ($3,300) for a first violation and up to 10,000 levs for a repeat offense for bar-owners or managers tolerating smoking in restricted places. Smokers who break the legislation face up to 500 levs for a first violation, which could be doubled for repeat violations.

A recent study showed 56 per cent of Bulgarians, the second heaviest smokers in the EU after Greeks, oppose the total prohibition on smoking in indoor public places.

The Bulgarian hotel and restaurant confederation argued that it expected up to 18,000 people to lose their works as some bars and restaurants would be forced to close as smokers are not permitted inside.

Businesses, already hit by the economic drop, have asked for a three-year reprieve for restaurants, bars and cafes, and even for nightclubs to be made total free.

 

Cigar Smokers Want Rights to Smoke in Public

Wednesday, May 18th, 2018

cheap chesterfield cigarettesAs quests for freedom go, it’s not exactly the fight against apartheid in South Africa. But cigar smokers around the country are fed up with smoking bans that prevent them from enjoying stogies in cigar bars with friends. A rising number of states have moved to exempt cigars from indoor smoking bans, often by establishing cigar bars or smoking lounges inside cigar stores. Pro-cigar groups have sprung up nationally and in most states, spreading a message that their product is fundamentally different from Chesterfield cigarettes.

Cigar smokers are not interested in exposing the general public to their pungent fumes, said Joe Arundel, president of the Cigar Association of Washington. But they don’t see why they can’t smoke in the company of fellow enthusiasts – a gathering known as a “herf” in cigar circles – in businesses dedicated solely to the product.

“It’s not like people walk into a cigar store by accident,” Arundel, who operates Rain City Cigar in Seattle, said.

Washington used to have cigar bars and lounges. But a ban on all indoor smoking in 2005 put them out of business. A bill introduced in the state Legislature this year that would allow a limited number of cigar lounges and bars has languished in committee, after getting vehement opposition from the state Department of Health.

The Health Department opposes any change to the state’s indoor smoking ban, one of the nation’s first, said Tim Church, a spokesman for the agency.

“The indoor smoking law was passed by a great majority in every county in Washington state,” Church said.

The ban is intended to protect the health of non-smokers and especially of employees who work in bars and restaurants, Church said.

“We don’t like the idea of an employee having to sign away their rights to health to have a job,” Church said.

Washington has been inhospitable to smokers for years. The state was an early adopter of smoking bans in bars and restaurants, and its cigarette tax of more than $3 a pack is among the highest in the nation.

Annie Tegen of Seattle, program manager for Americans for Nonsmokers’ Rights, said they oppose any effort to weaken smoking bans.

“The public loves this law,” Tegen said. “There is no reason to weaken this law and put our workers at risk.”

The anti-smoking group Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) of Washington, D.C., said there is no legal right to smoke in the U.S., and many other countries are adopting bans on public smoking.

“The tendency is more towards protecting the health of the population, rather than exemptions,” said Laurent Huber, head of the group.

After years of victories, there are signs that anti-smoking forces are encountering some resistance. A nationwide advocate for cigar smokers said the tide seems to be turning against bans that lump cigars with cigarettes.

Kansas, Minnesota and Illinois also have pending legislation that would loosen smoking bans to allow for cigar bars, said Glynn Loope, executive director of Cigar Rights of America.

“‘Five years ago, I wouldn’t give you a $10 bet on any of these bills being drafted,” Loope said. Now some might even be passed, he said. New York, Nebraska, and Oregon are among 13 states that ban indoor smoking but allow exemptions for cigar bars, he said.

Cigars and cigarettes have fundamental differences, cigar advocates say. Premium cigars are more expensive, take longer to smoke and tend to be favored by older people. Cigar smokers don’t chain-smoke and often regard their activity as an occasional luxury to be savored with friends and a drink, Loope said.

“The cigar industry is based on art and culture, and not being abusive to the product,” Loope said. “The average cigar smoker smokes two a month.”

Cigar stores tend to attract only cigar smokers, not people who would be offended by the smoke, he said.

“These shops lose a lot of their character and soul when they can’t allow use of a perfectly legal cigar in the shop,” Loope said.

No one is forced to work in cigar shops, and several states require such employees to sign waivers indicating they understand the dangers of second-hand smoke, Loope said.

Cigar advocates see themselves as oppressed by a hypocritical majority that is obsessed with stamping out tobacco use while tolerating alcohol.

Arundel noted the bill in Washington would allow a maximum of 100 cigar bars to open across the state. By contrast, there are 5,800 liquor licenses, he said.

“Should we be any more discriminated against than anybody else?” Arundel said.

Smoking opponents would no doubt argue with that logic – after all, bartenders can’t get sick from alcohol by serving it, but an employee of a cigar bar is exposed to secondhand smoke. Nevertheless, Arundel said cigar smokers will continue to fight for cigar bars and lounges, a cause they see as standing up for the rights of private property owners.

“All we are asking for in our state is a little bit of reason and fairness,” he said.

Cigar Lover Against Clayton’s Smoking Ban

Friday, March 4th, 2018

Arthur Gallagher used to enjoy strolling down the street every morning, getting a cup of java and a newspaper, and smoking a cigar in Concordia Park, near his home in the DeMun neighborhood. “It’s one of life’s simple pleasures,” said Gallagher, 55, a retired vineyard owner from Napa, Calif., who moved to Clayton about three years ago. That pleasure ended on Jan. 1, when Clayton’s ban on smoking Rich in parks went into effect.

On Thursday, while puffing on cigars on the sidewalk abutting Shaw Park near downtown Clayton, Gallagher and his legal team announced they had filed a suit challenging Clayton’s ordinance. The suit, filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court, argues that the ban denies Gallagher his constitutional rights. In specific, it cites the 14th Amendment’s due process and equal protection clauses.

Gallagher’s lawyers are W. Bevis Schock and Hugh A. Eastwood, assisted by Washington University law graduate Russell Anhalt. The suit contends that smoking is a “fundamental right” that’s “part and parcel of ancient American history, traditions and customs.” Schock mentioned American Indian peace pipes as an example.

The suit also argues that the ban discriminates against smokers, shows an irrational dislike of smokers and is arbitrary and capricious. It says the ban violates the Missouri Constitution’s guarantee of the “pursuit of happiness.”

The suit names as defendants the city of Clayton and Mayor Linda Goldstein, City Manager Craig Owens, Parks Director Patty DeForrest and Police Chief Thomas J. Byrne.

Goldstein, a strong advocate of anti-smoking laws, defended the ordinance. She said nearly 500 communities around the U.S. had banned smoking in public parks.

She said community response has been positive. City Attorney Kevin O’Keefe said the ordinance addressed “litter and unhealthy conduct on property owned by the city. The legal basis for the ordinance is strong and straightforward. …”
O’Keefe noted that the suit was prefaced by the musings of comedian Groucho Marx, a cigar lover. That, O’Keefe said, “is telling evidence of the merits of the case.”

Eastwood said the Groucho Marx reference was added to mock the city of Clayton. Many at Shaw Park Thursday afternoon were unaware of the ban, and some thought it silly.

Clayton resident Jim Harper, who was practicing a form of karate in the park, said he didn’t mind the smoking, as long as he’s not able to smell it. “It’s over the top banning it,” said Harper, a nonsmoker. “You’re outside. As long as you’re not downwind.”

John Saleeby, a Clayton resident, was pushing a child on a swing in a playground. He was unaware of the ban.

“It’s a park. It’s outdoors,” he said. He added: “I don’t smoke – except for maybe the occasional cigar – but this is ridiculous.”
on the sidewalks

Clayton enacted an indoor smoking ban on July 1. The outdoor ordinance bars lighting up in parks, on playgrounds and all other city-owned or leased facilities. That includes city-owned parking garages and lots. The law allows smoking on sidewalks, streets and alleys. Penalties are up to a $1,000 fine and 90 days in jail.

Bill Hannegan, an advocate for smokers’ rights who is paying some of the legal fees for this suit, said he was “glad to see it got filed. If that’s successful, that would help put a stop to it across the country. It was just passed in New York City. There’s no rational basis for it – and you’re pushing smokers onto the sidewalks and they get in people’s way.”

On the other side, Stacy Reliford, field government relations director for the American Cancer Society here, said the agency strongly supported Clayton’s outdoor ban.

Reliford also cited an opinion by a national group of public health lawyers, the Minnesota-based Tobacco Control Legal Consortium.
That says for smokers “there is no protected right under the due process clause of the Constitution, and smokers are not a protected category of people under the equal protection clause,” Reliford said.